Duke Blue Devils 2024-25 Team Preview
Roster Lookup
Starters
- Tyrese Proctor (G)
- Height/Class: 6-6, Junior
- Key Stats: 12.5 PPG, 3.1 REB, 41.2% 3PT, 29.8 MPG
- Kon Knueppel (G)
- Height/Class: 6-7, Freshman
- Key Stats: 14.4 PPG, 3.9 REB, 40.1% 3PT, 30.2 MPG
- Sion James (G)
- Height/Class: 6-6 220lbs, Junior
- Key Stats: 8.7 PPG, 4.2 REB, 41.7% 3PT, 25.4 MPG
- Cooper Flagg (F) Generational Player
- Height/Class: 6-9 205lbs, Freshman
- Key Stats: 18.9 PPG, 7.5 REB, 4.6 AST, 37.4% 3PT, 30.5 MPG
- Khaman Maluach (C)
- Height/Class: 7-2 250lbs, Freshman
- Key Stats: 8.7 PPG, 6.8 REB, 25.0% 3PT, 21.3 MPG
Bench
- Isaiah Evans (G)
- Height/Class: 6-6, Freshman
- Key Stats: 7.0 PPG, 1.2 REB, 41.6% 3PT, 14.1 MPG
- Caleb Foster (G)
- Height/Class: 6-5, Sophomore
- Key Stats: 5.1 PPG, 1.6 REB, 34.2% 3PT, 14.0 MPG
- Mason Gillis (F)
- Height/Class: 6-6, Senior
- Key Stats: 4.2 PPG, 2.6 REB, 34.4% 3PT, 15.0 MPG
- Patrick Ngongba II (C)
- Height/Class: 6-11, Freshman
- Key Stats: 4.0 PPG, 2.8 REB, 0.0% 3PT, 10.8 MPG
- Maliq Brown (F)
- Height/Class: 6-8, Junior
- Key Stats: 2.4 PPG, 3.7 REB, 33.3% 3PT, 15.8 MPG
Duke Team Breakdown
Strengths
- Positional Size Advantage
- 6-9 Cooper Flagg (F), 6-7 Kon Knueppel (G), and 7-2 Khaman Maluach (C) create mismatches. Guards like Proctor (6-6) and James (6-6) also tower over most backcourts.
- Enhances switchability on defense and high-percentage shooting over smaller defenders.
- Elite Shooting Efficiency
- #3 in Effective FG% (58.2%), #8 in 3P% (38.6%). Starters shoot 37-41% from deep, spacing the floor.
- Lockdown Defense
- #1 in Opponent Effective FG% (44.4%). Maluach (1.3 BPG) and Flagg (1.3 BPG) anchor the paint.
- Ball Security
- #3 in Assist/Turnover Ratio (1.81). Flagg (4.6 APG) minimize mistakes.
Weaknesses
- No True Point Guard
- Tyrese Proctor (2.2 APG) and Cooper Flagg (4.2 APG) handle playmaking, but lack a traditional floor general.
- Bench Depth & Consistency
- Bench averages 14-16 MPG and contributes just 19.4% of scoring (adding the context most of their games have been blowouts, where end of game minutes are available). Over-reliance on freshmen starters. They are Deep but Centralized most of the minutes on just the starters.
- Age & Experience
- The core of the team is centralized around freshmen.
- Not Real Weaknesses But Might Be in the Context of a Battle of Elites
- Hard to Call being top 140 in something (out 364) a “weakness”, but they do give up a relative amount of offensive rebounds, and They don’t create than much turnovers.
Overall Outlook
From both a statistical and “eye test” standpoint, this game appears tough for us to win. Most analytics favor Duke, and visually they boast three potential lottery picks—one of whom is often described as a “generational” talent. Everyone in their rotation has great size, and they’ve been blowing out most of their opponents. It’s easy to see why many people lean toward Duke.
Houston’s Advantages
- Home-State Advantage
- The game will be in San Antonio, which should give us a meaningful crowd advantage.
- This is the first Final Four in Texas with a Texas team participating, so even the more casual local fans could naturally root for us.
- Style of Defense
- Duke’s offense has looked phenomenal, but it hasn’t faced a defense anywhere near our level. Like no one even in our stratosphere
- The few “good” defenses they’ve seen (teams like Auburn or Arizona) play at a faster pace, allowing more transition opportunities. Duke hasn’t yet encountered a truly imposing, slow-tempo, half-court defense with our level of physicality.
- We’ve shown time and again we can force opponents into our style of play and pace… uncomfortable.
Duke’s Offense vs. Our Defense
-
Duke doesn’t have a traditional point guard orchestrating everything, which could really benefit our hedge-and-trap schemes.
-
However, their offense often runs through cooper on the perimeter as a forward, which is something we haven’t faced much. That will require adjustments in how we trap.
-
A unique thought: if we treat Cooper like a guard and Sion James like a forward, they start to resemble a BYU team we faced before (they had a 6’9" lottery-type point guard who could pass Egor, plus an athletic strong shooting power forward Mawot). We crushed them, which could be encouraging as a blueprint.
-
I trust Sampson to make whatever adjustments needed, based on what he has seen
-
Beyond any X’s and O’s, the biggest key is making them feel pressured and uncomfortable for all 40 minutes. As Hunter Dickinson recently mentioned in his new TV job, Houston forces you into quick decisions. No matter how talented Duke’s freshmen are, they’re still freshmen, and without a true PG to settle things.
-
If they’re allowed to run their offense comfortably, we’re likely to lose. But our program is built on unsettling opposing offenses—and Duke hasn’t seen this level of intensity yet.
Our Offense vs. Their Defense
-
Duke’s defense isn’t complex. It’s mostly built on length and athleticism—6’6” defenders on the perimeter and elite shot blockers protecting the rim. They play mostly man-to-man, try to fight through screens, and switch when needed. I expect our guys to find little windows to shoot, like off screens or transition etc. NOTE: they will switch to a full court zone from time to time like we’ve seen the last few games
-
Flagg is an elite defender—great bounce, instincts, and switchability—but he’s still 205 lbs. If that’s the matchup, J’Wan is bullying him in the post. Duke sometimes hides Cooper by having him defend the 3 when playing against physical forwards and uses Sion James (stronger at 6’6”, 220 lbs) at the 4. Even then, I’d expect J’Wan to win that matchup against Sion more often than not.
-
Given the stakes and the intensity we play with, I’d be surprised if we’re not crashing the boards hard and getting a few offensive rebounds for second-chance points.
-
If our defensive pressure translates into turnovers, we might score some transition points.
-
We should be able to reach around 68 points on a normal shooting night—assuming we aren’t ice-cold like in the Purdue game. The real question: will 68 be enough?
Other Thoughts
- Motivation & Mindset
- Everyone will be fired up for a Final Four, but last year’s ending still stings, and we’d love some get-back in this situation.
- Duke’s Lack of Close-Game Reps
- They’ve typically blown teams out and haven’t had to close out many tight games. All their “close game” wins were big leads by them turned semi-close by late runs. The only real back-and-forth close games late? Losses… So if we can keep it close, we could see an advantage in crunch-time execution.
- Foul Trouble
- Duke is good at drawing fouls, and we’ll be pressuring them heavily, so officiating could play a major role. Hopefully, the Texas crowd and atmosphere lean in our favor.
Prediction
- If Duke Feels Comfortable: If they run their offense smoothly, letting Cooper pick us apart and find open shooters, we probably lose by around 10 (with us cutting the lead late).
- If We Impose Our Culture: If we successfully harass them with our physical defense, force hurried decisions, and maintain that intensity for 40 minutes, we can win by about 8.
I don’t think it’ll be a nail-biter. One team will win comfortably-ish. Either their freshmen are overwhelmed by our defensive intensity… or they’re unfazed and scoring at a rate we can’t keep up with.