Oh my God dude we get it you hate Elon musk
And there there is no collusion.
More like youâre a fanboy.
Iâm just telling you why your analogy doesnât hold.
No Iâm not I just donât think everyone that disagrees with me politically is literally Hitler.
I said there we similarities not that it was the same thing
Iâve never called anyone Hitler or compared anyone to him. Literally or figuratively.
Why are you so charged about this?
I wouldnât make that statement about no collusion (just not confident in the accuracy), but Iâm not clear on the facts. I assume no advertiser that is a member of the safety group is required to take any action recommended by the group.
I meant no collusion allegation in the Exxon case. Thatâs the entire point of Muskâs from what I can tell.
Huh? Where did that come from. Certainly never seen RT call or equate anyone with Hitler. I donât think Iâve seen anyone do that on Coogfans really. Just very weird. Iâm not sure why youâre so worked up about us discussing the lawsuit.
Ahh, yes, you are correct then.
Doesnât matter man this place is an echo chamber.
Somehow itâs become extremely political even though it clearly says no politics
Itâs apples and oranges, the Exxon case is completely different. You need a different case to bolster your argument.
How is this particular discussion political?
Iâm not arguing for or against anything, I am simply suggesting that there could be merit to the elon musk lawsuit. The activist investors was an example of coordinated effort to damage a company, which is what Elon is saying happened to x/twitter
There very well could be, but itâs not from that case.
What isnât from what case?
The Exxon case is not supportive to Elonâs suit against the advertisers. They are different cases with different allegations.
Elon could have a case, though it would need to go to discovery to be able to prove some sort of antitrust conspiracy.
One of the reasons why I think that case youâre using doesnât fit is the investors were actual company owners that have a say in management. Advertisers and the safety group are basically Xâs customers.
The X lawsuit could very well have merit, I just donât agree that the case you cited has any similarities.
Ok, thanks