I am not in favor of invading Greenland by military force (or by any authoritative force)
But I think it would make sense to negotiate some sort of annexation deal if it means it benefits both US and Greenland economically
The fact of the matter is. Greenland’s ice sheets are melting, thus opening trade routes but also access to rare earth minerals that cannot be access otherwise.
When that levee breaks, there’s going to be more international interest in controlling those resources. Especially as climate change gets worse and economically extractable oil becomes unaffordable.
The USA literally has no choice to wane off of fossil fuels unless it wants to continue depending solely on foreign oil for its energy supply, because shale basins have already peaked
Let’s not go to the forbidden zone. One fact that we can’t take out from the ev, solar equation is the Western dependance on a dictatorship.
You can’t write, talk, debate without that fact.
NAIVITE has a clear and ruthless definition.
mileage tax is good to cover all vehicles regardless of power source. Also needs to be adjusted for weight as heavier vehicles put more wear and tear and the roads.
Tax payers should not be subsidizing EVs with those $7500 or less tax credits. Let those that want one buy one on their own. (PS. feel the same about homeowner mortgage deductions - should not exists)
EVs are good in their way. The infrastructure is not there yet for everyone to get one. It i not as simple as plugging in at night as not everyone has a house, but many live in apts, condos, high rises, etc…
Removing the ICE vehicles will cause the cost of everything else to go up. Plastic is made from oil and reducing 40% production will increase costs. Good or bad is to be determined. People may also just buy less plastic junk.
If solar and wind energy could produce plastic, cement and steel as cheap as fossil fuels, then renewable energy would already be the current energy ecosystem across the world
Fact of the matter is, it can’t do that, and fossil fuel companies will have to increase prices for refined products not directly related to gasoline transportation in order to remain profitable (not go bankrupt) because said products will still be highly in demand, such as cement and steel for road/highway infrastructure