we can easily make 10% or 20% of a SEC school, like Ole Miss’ complete NIL Bucket #1 pot, with a single corporate NIL deal.
The schools that “live and die” from passing that hat around asking for donations will burn out very quickly. Their fan’s wealth is limited.
Bucket #1 NIL Collectives is not sustainable for 75% of colleges…those that can tap into Bucket #2 + a healthy Bucket #1 will reign supreme.
We can easily can fit into that category because of the abundance of corporate NIL deals in our market and especially if they are tax write offs or part of their marketign budget.
Yes, just look at the results and the roster talent and it’s obvious basketball is WAY ahead of football on all counts. I’ll believe we can compete in football NIL when we start getting top recruits and winning 9+ games a year. I’ve always thought the NIL era was not going to be good for our football program, and nothing has happened thus far to convince me otherwise.
It’s certainly easier…simply in terms of TOTAL DOLLARS, to come up with money for a few basketball recruits per year than 25-30 football recruits capable of going up against the best from the SEC and B1G.
That’s why we have found a way to do one (as have schools like UConn, Gonzaga, etc), but NOT the other.